PDA

View Full Version : Instead of an expensive SLR???


Stingray
08-24-2004, 3:18 AM
I can see on the pictures on this site that with an SLR the most beautiful pictures can be taken. But I want to buy a compact digital camera which I can also use for other thinks then aquatic photography. I was thinking of a Canon Powershot S410 can someone give any advice on this camera. I know the reviews are mostly good on this camera but can I take good pictures for use on my website.
Thanks in advance.
Frank.

Roy W.
08-24-2004, 6:56 AM
I am quite happy with my Sony DSC-F828
Allround camera, take good aquatic pic`s and also for "normal" use.
Take pictures of my son, wife, wildlife and motorsports.

08-24-2004, 12:17 PM
Well, for aquatic photography, you will need ability to control Aperature, Shutter speed, white balance manually, and some kind of a Macro setting. You can check the review of this camera on dpreview.com to see if it has those features. Remember, you are shooting through water, so manual features are a must to fool the lens. :) Ability to mount an off-camera flash is very good if you dont have amazing lighting that will let you avoid using flash at low shutter speeds.

Stingray
08-24-2004, 6:07 PM
Yes ok this is Ok with this camera (not as much as SlR cameras) but did someone on this site took pictures with such a camera. Or are all the people on this board owners of slr cameras. The pictures I've seen are top quality some pictures have taken my breath a way( I didn't know this is posible with a picture). But a SLR camera only for taking pictures of my freshwaterstingrays is to expansive for me. And I think an SLR is to big and heavy to cary around for the other kinds of photograghy kids outdoors family party.
Regards
FRank